
One of the arguments to support the existence of God is the moral argument.
The moral argument states:
->Moral values are objective facts:
--->Either atheism or theism must account for these facts.
----->Atheism cannot account for the facts.
------->Theism (belief in God) can account for the facts therefore theism is correct.
For the moral argument to work 2 things must be proven:
1) Moral values are truly objective (not subject to anyone's personal opinion but rather are always true despite how some people may feel about them).
2) Atheism really can't account for the existence of objective morals.
Are moral values truly unalterable? Can some moral decisions be "true" for some people and "untrue" for others? Let's get out of the realm of the abstract and let's get to a down to earth situation to answer these questions.
Suppose your wife or your mother decides to go out for an evening to get some groceries. She goes in, gets everything on the list and checks out. Then she carts the food out into the parking lot and gets all the food into the car. Seeing that it is 9:00 PM and very dark she gets into the car and after she gets a mile down the road she feels a gun pressed to her neck and a raspy voice telling her where to go. After driving a couple of hours outside of anyone's sight the man tells her, "Stop the car. Get out. Take off your clothes." After a restless and frantic night of police calls and every desperate measure to find out where your wife was you get word from an officer who found the car and the woman a couple hours outside of town. "I'm sorry to be the one to tell you this sir, but your wife was raped several times and then she was murderer."
If something inside you doesn't burn with the most violent rage at the person who would do such a thing, something is terribly wrong! We start thinking of the most painful torture fit for such evil people!
Now let me ask you a question. Can someone really say "Rape is ok for me but you may have a different opinion and we will just have to respect each others differences?" My answer to that is a HELL NO! Don't just listen to me though, ask yourself how you would feel in such a circumstance. How do newscasters report these stories? Do they do it with a grin like the weatherman who gives the 5 day forecast? No!! They are distraught and disturbed. They are solemn.
Ok I think most people will agree with me on that particular matter but are morals truly objective and not determined by personal preference? Let's look at some moral issues that are widely debated. Abortion. Some people think its ok and some think its wrong. Does this prove that morality is determined by people? No. The reason this isn't so is because the main issue at stake in abortion is not whether or not murder is wrong but what is argued is whether or not abortion classifies as murder! It is helpful to think of morals in columns: Adultery: Murder: Stealing: Lying. Now it is obvious that everyone agrees that these are wrong but what is argued about is whether or not something falls under that category. For example, Mormons believe that it isn't wrong for a man to have many wives. Even though that is the case adultery is still a sin to them! How can that be? It is possible because they don't think of having many wives as breaking the moral code of adultery but being unfaithful to those wives is adultery. A mormon would consider adultery as one of his wives having a sexual relationship with someone else or even himself having sex with a woman other than his wives.
This is important to understand because the only thing disputing about morals does is ensure that there truly are objective morals!! Consider these evidences of an objective moral code as well:
1) Humans live as if they are obligated to obey certain real values.
2) Moral outrage is evidence of a universal moral obligation.
3) Moral judgments are evidence of a universal moral obligation.
4) Every society has a similar moral code.
Let's look at this negatively as well. If all moral decision were relative then...
1) No moral code could be better than another!
2) There can be no such thing as moral progress ("I'm becoming a better person!").
3) Moral effort becomes meaningless.
4) No human being is better than another human.
5) All choices are equally good.
Really think about some of those. If there isn't a standard to judge our actions by then there is no correct behavior! That is not how we live though. We live with the weight of moral obligation every day of our lives. Would you really believe that there are no evil or good people? Was Mother Theresa a better person than Hitler? Not if you believe that morality is based on personal opinion because if it is then there is no correct opinion.
The reason Atheism can't account for the existence of objective morals is because something can only be objective (free from opinion) if it is determined by an eternal and unchanging source. The God of the Bible, Yahweh, has told us that he is that eternal and unchanging source. Since that is the case his character becomes the standard for all right behavior because he is the eternal One! Amen.